Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835019›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Managing Arrhythmias in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Milrinone and Dobutamine Therapy.

Jodi-Ann A Fletcher, Savitri Poornima Halaharvi, Cinda Manuvel, Alexander L Brooks, Randev A Wannakuwatte, Eugenio Lucano Gomez, Stacy Ann Reid, Nithin Karnan, Snehitha Reddy, Shriya Maini and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jodi-Ann A FletcherInternal Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George, GRD.
Savitri Poornima HalaharviInternal Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Cinda ManuvelInternal Medicine, Believers Church Medical College, Kuttapuzha, IND.
Alexander L BrooksInternal Medicine and Primary Care, Ivy Green Medical, Kingston, JAM.
Randev A WannakuwatteSurgery, University of Colombo, Colombo, LKA.
Eugenio Lucano GomezMedicine and Surgery, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolás de los Garza, MEX.
Stacy Ann ReidMedicine and Surgery, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, JAM.
Nithin KarnanInternal Medicine, K.A.P. Viswanatham Government Medical College, Tiruchirappalli, IND.
Snehitha ReddyMedicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, CHN.
Shriya MainiInternal Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, IND.
Bhargav A SaidInternal Medicine, University of Visayas - Gullas College of Medicine, Cebu City, PHL.
Zahra NazirInternal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shock is a state of inadequate perfusion that affects vital organs. Cardiogenic shock (CS) predisposes patients to various arrhythmias. The adverse effect depends on intervention and pharmacogenomics. This narrative review sheds light on treatment strategies for arrhythmias caused by milrinone and dobutamine when managing CS. Dobutamine, through beta-1 agonism, and milrinone, by phosphodiesterase-3 inhibition, increase cardiac contractility by enhancing the availability of calcium to the myocardium. Dobutamine is also a beta-2 agonist, and milrinone is a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor; both result in peripheral vasodilation, leading to their use preferentially in patients with CS with normotensive blood pressure. To narrow down relevant literature, various electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, were searched. The review revealed limited evidence favoring either milrinone or dobutamine as the preferred inotropic agent for managing CS, but it did reveal that though hospital stays using dobutamine were shorter, mortality from its induced arrhythmias led to an increase in all-cause mortality rates. Both proarrhythmic agents triggered ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, some requiring cardioversion while others are non-sustained and managed medically or symptomatically. Though neither agent has a specific reversal agent, the effect of dobutamine was seen to be successfully aborted using intravenous ultrashort half-life beta-blockers (such as esmolol). The findings accentuated the critical need for a tailored approach to managing these iatrogenic arrhythmias, emphasizing clinical vigilance and individualized patient care.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockdobutamineheart failuremilrinonevasopressor

Identifiers

PMID39835019
PMCPMC11743927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.