Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835256›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025

Geographic accessibility to hospital childbirths in Brazil (2010-2011 and 2018-2019): a cross-sectional study.

Priscila Costa Albuquerque, Lucas Lopes Felipe, Juliana Freitas Lopes, Wagner de Souza Tassinari, Fabio Zicker, Bruna de Paula Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priscila Costa AlbuquerqueCenter for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av. Brasil 4036, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-361, RJ, Brazil.
Lucas Lopes FelipePost Graduation Program in Informatics (PPGI), Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Athos da Silveira Ramos 274, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-916, RJ, Brazil.
Juliana Freitas LopesCenter for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av. Brasil 4036, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-361, RJ, Brazil.
Wagner de Souza TassinariMathematics Department, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7 Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Fabio ZickerCenter for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av. Brasil 4036, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-361, RJ, Brazil.
Bruna de Paula FonsecaCenter for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av. Brasil 4036, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-361, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delays in obstetric care are associated with adverse maternal outcomes, while long-distance travel for delivery is associated with high neonatal mortality and increased maternal morbidity. Distance and travel time are key components of geographic accessibility to health services and important risk indicators for maternal and neonatal care. This study evaluated whether the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) has been geographically accessible in providing hospital childbirth services, over time. Methods: Geographic accessibility to hospital deliveries in Brazil was mapped over two biennia (2010-2011 and 2018-2019), spanning a 10-year period, using national aggregated data from SUS Hospital Admissions Authorizations. Travel flows, distances, and times between women's municipalities of residence and hospitals were estimated. Findings: A total of 6,930,944 hospital deliveries were analyzed. Overall, 25.4% (n = 1,759,306) of pregnant women traveled outside their municipalities to give birth in SUS hospitals, increasing from 23.6% (n = 843,501) in 2010-2011 to 27.3% (n = 915,805) in 2018-2019. Distance and travel time rose by 31.1% (54.0 km-70.8 km) and 33.6% (63.1-84.3 min), respectively. Women experiencing maternal and/or neonatal death traveled longer distances and times. Regional disparities were evident: the Northeast had the highest proportion of women traveling (35.6%; n = 817,499), and the North had the lowest (16.0%; n = 138,295). Women in the North faced the longest travel distances (97.5-133.4 km) and times (1,012-1,850 min), while those in the Southeast and South experienced the shortest distances (37.2-55.9 km and 41.2-54.8 km, respectively) and times (38-52 min and 41-52 min). Interpretation: The results highlight regional disparities in maternal health service access within the SUS, which may affect maternal and neonatal outcomes. Targeted public health measures are needed to improve the availability of service, particularly in the North and Northeast regions, where access issues are most severe. Funding: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; CNPq; FAPERJ.

Indexed as

BrazilGeographic accessibilityHealth equityHealth services accessibilityHospital deliveriesMaternal health servicesTravel distance

Identifiers

PMID39835256
PMCPMC11742817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.