ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Geographic accessibility to hospital childbirths in Brazil (2010-2011 and 2018-2019): a cross-sectional study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical care utilisation, and outcomes of critically ill obstetric patients in India: a multicentre ICU registry study (2019-2024).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- Binational Analysis of Maternal Mortality Between Brazil and Portugal in 2020-2023: A Population-Based Epidemiological Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Article
- Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies in Brazil: A nationwide population-based study, 2015-2024.PloS one · 2026Article
- Hospitalizations for congenital infections in Brazil's unified health system: nationwide trends and regional disparities, 2008-2024.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delays in obstetric care are associated with adverse maternal outcomes, while long-distance travel for delivery is associated with high neonatal mortality and increased maternal morbidity. Distance and travel time are key components of geographic accessibility to health services and important risk indicators for maternal and neonatal care. This study evaluated whether the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) has been geographically accessible in providing hospital childbirth services, over time. Methods: Geographic accessibility to hospital deliveries in Brazil was mapped over two biennia (2010-2011 and 2018-2019), spanning a 10-year period, using national aggregated data from SUS Hospital Admissions Authorizations. Travel flows, distances, and times between women's municipalities of residence and hospitals were estimated. Findings: A total of 6,930,944 hospital deliveries were analyzed. Overall, 25.4% (n = 1,759,306) of pregnant women traveled outside their municipalities to give birth in SUS hospitals, increasing from 23.6% (n = 843,501) in 2010-2011 to 27.3% (n = 915,805) in 2018-2019. Distance and travel time rose by 31.1% (54.0 km-70.8 km) and 33.6% (63.1-84.3 min), respectively. Women experiencing maternal and/or neonatal death traveled longer distances and times. Regional disparities were evident: the Northeast had the highest proportion of women traveling (35.6%; n = 817,499), and the North had the lowest (16.0%; n = 138,295). Women in the North faced the longest travel distances (97.5-133.4 km) and times (1,012-1,850 min), while those in the Southeast and South experienced the shortest distances (37.2-55.9 km and 41.2-54.8 km, respectively) and times (38-52 min and 41-52 min). Interpretation: The results highlight regional disparities in maternal health service access within the SUS, which may affect maternal and neonatal outcomes. Targeted public health measures are needed to improve the availability of service, particularly in the North and Northeast regions, where access issues are most severe. Funding: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; CNPq; FAPERJ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.