ArticleCurrent pharmaceutical design2025
Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of the Methanolic Extract and Fractions of
Article in Current pharmaceutical design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
methodsThe present study was intended to evaluate the antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and nephroprotective potential of the crude methanolic leaf extract and ethyl acetate, chloroform, n-hexane, and aqueous fractions of DS in paracetamol-intoxicated rabbits. Paracetamol (2 g/Kg BW) was applied to induce liver and kidney injury in rabbits while the methanolic extract and fractions of DS were applied in the dose range of 150 mg/Kg to 300 mg/Kg body weight for 21 days. Histopathology of the liver, and kidney and analysis of ALT (Alanine Transaminase), ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase), total bilirubin, serum urea, serum creatinine, and serum uric acid were carried out.
resultsThe hepatoprotective and nephroprotective potential of the extract and fractions of DS at the dose level of 300 mg/Kg BW was highly significant (P ˂ 0.01). ALT was found elevated in the paracetamol-treated group (117.3 ± 1.61 U/L) compared to the group treated with methanolic extract of DS, (57.3 ± 0.87 U/L) and normal control group (60.6 ± 1.58 U/L) at 300 mg/kg BW. Elevated levels of ALP (120 ± 1.58 U/L) and Bilirubin (1.6 ± 0.32 mg/dl) were found in the paracetamol-treated group compared with the group treated with methanolic extract of DS (67.5 ± 1.35 U/L; 0.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl) and normal control group (70.1 ± 1.53 U/L; 0.4 ± 0.16 mg/dl) respectively at 300 mg/kg BW. The methanolic extract of DS produced a marked scavenging activity of the DPPH free radicals (88.2 ± 0.006 %) followed by the fractions of DS compared to ascorbic acid (95.5 + 0.003%) at a concentration of 1000 μg/ml. The effects were comparable to those produced by ascorbic acid. Liver and kidney histology of the rabbits treated with extract, fractions, and ascorbic acid of DS caused reductions in the pathological features compared to the paracetamol-treated animals. The histological observations and chemical pathological alterations demonstrated the significant hepatoprotective and nephroprotective benefits of the DS extract and its fractions.
conclusionIt has been concluded that the methanolic extract and fractions of DS possess antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and nephroprotective properties in paracetamol-intoxicated rabbits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39835560What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.