Evidence mapPaperPMID 39835580Full record

ReviewHealth promotion international2025

Physical activity-the past, present and potential future: a state-of-the-art review.

Matthew Mclaughlin, Peter McCue, Brittany Swelam, Joey Murphy, Sarah Edney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew MclaughlinUWA Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009,Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8556
Peter McCueSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kennington, New South Wales, 2052,Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9806-0594
Brittany SwelamFaculty of Health, School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125,Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5345-3308
Joey MurphySchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Senate House, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS81TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-645X
Sarah EdneySaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549,Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3925-517X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a state-of-the-art review of historical developments, current approaches and recommended future directions in physical activity (PA) research, practice and policy. Since the early epidemiological studies in the 1950s, PA research has developed from within a biomedical paradigm. There is now a strong evidence base linking PA with positive health outcomes. PA is currently understood as a multi-sector issue, requiring a multi-sector solution (e.g. transport, urban design, sport), resulting in multiple individual and societal benefits (e.g. addresses multiple Sustainable Development Goals), however, there is a disconnect between interventions, policy and practice. This may be due to limited cross-sector collaboration between, and within, the public and private sectors. Furthermore, the mix of policy instruments employed by governments to implement PA policy to date has been dominated by soft (e.g. communication) rather than hard options (e.g. fiscal). To progress in PA promotion, we need to move beyond health outcome and intervention evidence generation (e.g. focus on testing efficacy in highly controlled settings), to more complex, real world, politically informed, multi-sector, scale-up and policies, while concurrently collecting data to evaluate such efforts (e.g. natural experiments and evaluations of the policy process). PA programs may benefit from greater incorporation of public policy considerations, so that proposed interventions and policies are designed with potential political constraints in mind. We conclude by providing a call to action to advance the understanding of the role of politics in PA, in order to develop politically informed action on PA.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionHealth PolicyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansadvocacyinterventionsphysical activitypolicyscale-upsystems

Identifiers

PMID39835580
PMCPMC11747872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.