Evidence mapPaperPMID 39836420Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Age at Menopause and Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Korea.

Byung-Joon Ko, Jin-Hyung Jung, Kyungdo Han, Ga Eun Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Byung-Joon KoJoon 365 Clinic, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Hyung JungSamsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Kyungdo HanDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ga Eun NamDepartment of Family Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is limited evidence regarding the association between age at menopause and incident type 2 diabetes (T2D). Objective: To investigate whether age at menopause and premature menopause are associated with T2D incidence in postmenopausal Korean women. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study was conducted among a nationally representative sample from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database of 1 125 378 postmenopausal women without T2D who enrolled in 2009. The median (IQR) follow-up was 8.4 (8.1-8.7) years. Data were analyzed in March 2024. Exposures: Age at menopause and premature menopause (menopause onset at age <40 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incident T2D. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for incident T2D by age at menopause, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Of 1 125 378 participants (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 61.2 [8.4] years), 113 864 individuals (10.1%) were diagnosed with T2D at least 1 year after enrollment. Women with menopause onset at ages younger than 40 years (premature menopause; HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18) and ages 40 to 44 years (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06) had increased risk of T2D compared with those with onset at age 50 years or older, with adjustment for sociodemographic, lifestyle, cardiometabolic, psychiatric, and reproductive factors; a younger age at menopause was associated with increased risk of developing T2D (P for trend <.001). Body mass index, depressive disorder, and prediabetes modified the association in subgroup analyses; for example, for individuals with premature menopause vs those with menopause at ages 50 years or older, HRs were 1.54 (95% CI, 1.14-2.06) for a BMI less than 18.5 and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.00-1.30) for a BMI of 30 or greater (P < .001), 1.28 (95% CI, 1.12-1.45) for individuals with depression and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.07-1.16) for those without depression (P = .01), and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.18-1.33) for individuals who were not prediabetic and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.99-1.11) those who were prediabetic (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, premature and early menopause were associated with a higher risk of T2D, highlighting the need for targeted public health strategies aimed at preventing or delaying T2D among postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MenopauseMenopause, PrematureAdultAgedAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRepublic of KoreaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39836420
PMCPMC11751743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.