Observational studyScientific reports2025
Intermittent documentation of blood pressure values does not provide comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic response during continuous intravenous medication administration.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Should Aggressive Blood Pressure Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Be Guided with Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring?Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Blood Pressure Variability After Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Refining Its Definition, Intervention Opportunities, and Research Directions.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that is frequently discussed in static terms. There exist many limitations in current documentation systems whereby documented BP values may not be reflective of the dynamic variability of BP. This study used an observational, prospective, non-randomized study design to examine the variability in BP response during intravenous vasoactive medication administration in an intensive care unit setting. Subjects admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit were monitored continuously during a 12-hour period. The BP values include systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. Intermittent values from an intra-arterial figurecatheter (a-line) and continuously sampled values from an a-line obtained using continuous data acquisition (CDA) software, were compared to intermittently sampling of cuff-based BP measurements documented in the medical record. The 30 patients provided 1,220,511 BP observations from CDA, 944 from a-line documentation, and 416 from cuff-based BP documentation. The systolic BP was used as a goal parameter for 23 (77%) of the patients. Repeated measures models demonstrated that on average cuff-based differed from intermittent a-line and from CDA (p < .005) for all BP values. No differences between a-line and CDA were observed. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.72 for a-line, cuff-based BP, and CDA, indicating moderate agreement. Using intermittently documented BP values does not fully represent the dynamic nature of BP over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.