ArticleBMC nutrition2025
An assessment of compliance with proposed regulations to restrict on-package marketing of packaged foods to improve nutrition in South Africa.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Food Value Chain Interventions on Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltra-processed products (UPPs), high in sugar, fat and sodium, contribute to increasing burdens of obesity and non-communicable diseases in South Africa (SA). Increased consumption and acceptability of UPPs is driven, in part by aggressive marketing. Front of package labelling laws, particularly warning labels (WLs) coupled with marketing restrictions, have been recommended to improve consumer awareness of unhealthy products, incentivise reformulation and underpin other interventions. The SA government published a draft regulation to introduce WLs and restrict marketing, called R3337. This study aims to analyse on-package marketing and create a baseline to evaluate compliance with the proposed R3337.
methodsThis study is an analysis of a dataset of 6768 packaged food products, collected as pictures of products in four major grocery stores in Cape Town, SA between March and July 2019. A codebook was developed based on R337. The codebook was used to identify and assess child-directed marketing (CDM) and health claims on products potentially subject to front-of-package WLs. Food packages and their nutritional information were coded and analyzed to determine whether the product would be required to carry a WL and whether the package included regulated marketing.
resultsThe majority (80.16%) of products analyzed would require WLs under R3337 due to high levels of sugar, sodium, or saturated fat. CDM was prevalent, with 59.26% of products displaying some form of marketing, primarily animated characters and depictions of children. Health claims were also common, with 83% occurring on WL products. DISCUSSION: Using a WL system in SA could effectively target common forms of on-package marketing of unhealthy products, given the high prevalence of CDM and health claims on products likely to carry WLs. Such interventions may contribute to improving diets and reducing UPP consumption. Some forms of CDM are not regulated under R3337 and we recommend expanding the regulation to include these. This study provides a baseline which should be used for future research to evaluate R3337 when it is implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.