Evidence mapPaperPMID 39838554Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

AI Machine Learning-Based Diabetes Prediction in Older Adults in South Korea: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Hocheol Lee, Myung-Bae Park, Young-Joo Won

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hocheol Lee1, Department of Health Administration, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Changjogwan, Yonseidae-gil 1, Wonju, 26493, Republic of Korea, +82 (0) 33-760-2257.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-8843
Myung-Bae Park1, Department of Health Administration, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Changjogwan, Yonseidae-gil 1, Wonju, 26493, Republic of Korea, +82 (0) 33-760-2257.ORCID 0000-0002-1892-6632
Young-Joo Won1, Department of Health Administration, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Changjogwan, Yonseidae-gil 1, Wonju, 26493, Republic of Korea, +82 (0) 33-760-2257.ORCID 0000-0001-9861-6740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is prevalent in older adults, and machine learning algorithms could help predict diabetes in this population. Objective: This study determined diabetes risk factors among older adults aged ≥60 years using machine learning algorithms and selected an optimized prediction model. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 3084 older adults aged ≥60 years in Seoul from January to November 2023. Data were collected using a mobile app (Gosufit) that measured depression, stress, anxiety, basal metabolic rate, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and average daily step count. Health coordinators recorded data on diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, percent body fat, and percent muscle. The presence of diabetes was the target variable, with various health indicators as predictors. Machine learning algorithms, including random forest, gradient boosting model, light gradient boosting model, extreme gradient boosting model, and k-nearest neighbors, were employed for analysis. The dataset was split into 70% training and 30% testing sets. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs) were used for model interpretability. Results: Significant predictors of diabetes included hypertension (χ²1=197.294; P<.001), hyperlipidemia (χ²1=47.671; P<.001), age (mean: diabetes group 72.66 years vs nondiabetes group 71.81 years), stress (mean: diabetes group 42.68 vs nondiabetes group 41.47; t3082=-2.858; P=.004), and heart rate (mean: diabetes group 75.05 beats/min vs nondiabetes group 73.14 beats/min; t3082=-7.948; P<.001). The extreme gradient boosting model (XGBM) demonstrated the best performance, with an accuracy of 84.88%, precision of 77.92%, recall of 66.91%, F1 score of 72.00, and AUC of 0.7957. The SHAP analysis of the top-performing XGBM revealed key predictors for diabetes: hypertension, age, percent body fat, heart rate, hyperlipidemia, basal metabolic rate, stress, and oxygen saturation. Hypertension strongly increased diabetes risk, while advanced age and elevated stress levels also showed significant associations. Hyperlipidemia and higher heart rates further heightened diabetes probability. These results highlight the importance and directional impact of specific features in predicting diabetes, providing valuable insights for risk stratification and targeted interventions. Conclusions: This study focused on modifiable risk factors, providing crucial data for establishing a system for the automated collection of health information and lifelog data from older adults using digital devices at service facilities.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRisk Factorsagingartificial intelligencediabetesextreme gradient boosting modelgeriatricsmachine learningolder adultsprediction modelsuper-aging population

Identifiers

PMID39838554
PMCPMC11779598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.