ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Differentiation of early-stage endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions: a comparative study of six diffusion models.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precise zonal diagnosis: multi-b-value DWI model reveals differential predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in peripheral and transition zones.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with pathological biomarkers for axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Prediction of induction chemotherapy response in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on three pretreatment non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant endometrial lesions holds substantial clinical importance. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various diffusion models in the preoperative diagnosis of early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC). Methods: A total of 72 consecutive patients with benign or malignant endometrial lesions from the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province were prospectively enrolled between April 2021 and July 2023. Fourteen diffusion parameters derived from monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), stretched exponential model (SEM), continuous-time random walk (CTRW), and fractional order calculus (FROC) models were calculated and compared. Independent predictors of early-stage EC were identified using logistic regression analysis. The performance of the diffusion parameters, both individually and in combination with effective clinical indicators, for differentiating benign and malignant endometrial lesions was evaluated. Results: This study consisted of 17 patients with benign endometrial lesions and 55 patients with EC. Significant differences in age and menopausal status were observed between the benign and malignant endometrial groups (P=0.015 and P=0.011, respectively). With the exception of the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f), all other parameters exhibited significant differences between the benign and malignant groups (P<0.05). Mean kurtosis (MK), true diffusion coefficient (D), and temporal diffusion heterogeneity index (α Conclusions: MK, D, and α
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.