Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Integrating deep learning in public health: a novel approach to PICC-RVT risk assessment.

Yue Li, Shengxiao Nie, Lei Wang, Dongsheng Li, Shengmiao Ma, Ting Li, Hong Sun

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue Li *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shengxiao Nie *Department of Nursing, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Nursing, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dongsheng LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shengmiao MaSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ting LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hong SunBeijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning is pivotal for predicting Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT) risk, facilitating early diagnosis and proactive treatment. Existing models often assess PICC-RVT risk as static and discrete outcomes, which may limit their practical application. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of seven diverse machine learning algorithms, including three deep learning and four traditional machine learning models, that incorporate time-series data to assess PICC-RVT risk. It also seeks to identify key predictive factors for PICC-RVT using these models. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-center cohort study involving 5,272 patients who underwent PICC placement. After preprocessing patient data, the models were trained. Demographic, clinical pathology, and treatment data were analyzed to identify predictive factors. A variable analysis was then conducted to determine the most significant predictors of PICC-RVT. Model performance was evaluated using the Concordance Index (c-index) and the composite Brier score, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) from cross-validation folds assessed model stability. Results: Deep learning models generally outperformed traditional machine learning models in terms of predictive accuracy (mean c-index: 0.949 vs. 0.732; mean integrated Brier score: 0.046 vs. 0.093). Specifically, the DeepSurv model demonstrated exceptional precision in risk assessment (c-index: 0.95). Stability varied with the number of predictive factors, with Cox-Time showing the highest ICC (0.974) with 16 predictive factors, and DeepSurv the most stable with 26 predictive factors (ICC: 0.983). Key predictors across models included albumin levels, prefill sealant type, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Conclusion: Machine learning models that incorporate time-to-event data can effectively predict PICC-RVT risk. The DeepSurv model, in particular, shows excellent discriminative and calibration capabilities. Albumin levels, type of prefill sealant, and activated partial thromboplastin time are critical indicators for identifying and managing high-risk PICC-RVT patients.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralDeep LearningPublic HealthVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsartificial intelligencemachine learningperipherally inserted central catheterthrombosistime-to-event

Identifiers

PMID39839389
PMCPMC11747573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.