ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
Current status and perspectives of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare complement-driven acquired hemolytic anemia with specific presentations of hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, fatigue, and thrombosis. Objective: To review the current therapeutic strategies for PNH, including anti-complement therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), focusing on the tailoring of the approach to the disease subtype. Results: The outcome of alloHCT varies depending on disease severity, thrombotic history, and response to prior therapies. Non-transplant PNH therapies include anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies that reduce terminal complement activation (eculizumab, ravulizumab, and crovalimab) and proximal complement pathway inhibitors such as pegcetacoplan (C3 inhibitor), iptacopan (complement factor B inhibitor), and danicopan (complement factor D inhibitor). Although complement inhibitors have revolutionized treatment, alloHCT remains the only curative therapy, particularly for patients who are refractory to medical management or have severe cytopenia. This review outlines the conditioning regimens used in alloHCT and summarizes recent studies showing that overall survival rates improve with less toxic conditioning protocols. Conclusions: AlloHCT can be used to manage PNH, particularly in patients who are resistant to or without access to complement-targeted therapies. Any potential cure offered by alloHCT must be counterbalanced by the significant procedure risks, including graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related mortality, particularly in patients with comorbidities. In the case of severe aplastic anemia with an associated PNH clone, immunoablative protocols based on anti-thymocyte globulin serotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide are recommended. The use of reduced toxicity protocols with fludarabine has been well-documented in patients with classic PNH. A treosulfan/fludarabine-based regimen is recommended; however, there is no consensus on optimal drug selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.