Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840048›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

Tumor-associated lymphatic vessel density is a postoperative prognostic biomarker of hepatobiliary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jin Li, Yu-Bo Liang, Qing-Bo Wang, Yu-Kai Li, Xing-Ming Chen, Wan-Ling Luo, Yawhan Lakang, Zi-Sheng Yang, Yan Wang, Zhi-Wei Li and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jin Li *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yu-Bo Liang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Qing-Bo Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yu-Kai Li *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xing-Ming Chen *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Wan-Ling Luo *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yawhan Lakang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Zi-Sheng Yang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Zhi-Wei LiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yang KeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether tumor-associated lymphatic vessel density (LVD) could predict the survival of patients with hepato-biliary-pancreatic (HBP) cancers after radical resection. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the inception to July 31, 2024 for literature that reported the role of LVD in overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with HBP cancers after radical resection. Results: Ten studies with 761 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The results indicated that a higher level of LVD was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.63 to 5.04) and worse RFS (HR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.41 to 7.17) in HBP cancers. Subgroup analysis based on pathological types revealed that a higher level of LVD was significantly related to worse OS in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.78), cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 4.65, 95% CI 1.70 to 12.70), and gallbladder cancer patients (HR = 4.64, 95% CI 1.37 to 15.71). The levels of LVD were not significantly associated with OS in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients after radical resection (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.89). Similarly, a higher level of LVD was significantly associated with worse RFS in HCC (HR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.65) and cholangiocarcinoma patients (HR = 4.54, 95% CI 2.10 to 9.83). Conclusions: A higher level of LVD was a biomarker for the prediction of worse OS and RFS in patients with hepatobiliary cancers after radical resection. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024571167.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic VesselsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPostoperative PeriodPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumorbile duct cancerhepatocellular carcinomaliver cancerlymphangiogenesispancreatic cancerprognosissurgery

Identifiers

PMID39840048
PMCPMC11747820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.