ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
South Korea's healthcare expenditure: a comprehensive study of public and private spending across health conditions, demographics, and payer types (2011-2020).
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Value of AI in Critical Care Using Real-World Evidence on Intensive Care Unit Mortality Prediction: Cost-Utility Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Frailty Components as Moderators of the Subjective Cognitive Decline-Depressive Symptoms Association: A Sex-Stratified Population-Based Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the effects of population aging on health financing structures: evidence from APEC countries using panel data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Addressing low-value care (LVC) in Asia: a narrative review of Choosing Wisely and other initiatives across Asia.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- The toll of tobacco: smoking-attributable health spending in South Korea, 2014-2024. National claims evidence for cost recovery.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Comparison of health care utilisation and spending among National Health Insurance and Medical Aid beneficiaries in Korea.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Associations between hospital admission frequency and household financial outcomes in Korea.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Can sports consumption cities reduce residents' medical expenditures? Evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Trends in Health Expenditures for Chronic Disease Management: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and Dyslipidemia from 2013 to 2020.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: South Korea has witnessed a rapid increase in health expenditure, reaching USD 135 billion in 2021 and accounting for 9.3% of its GDP, surpassing the OECD average. Despite achieving universal health coverage, significant gaps remain in service coverage, leading to high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses that expose households to financial burdens. Methods: This study examines healthcare spending in South Korea from 2011 to 2020 using national datasets, focusing on expenditures across two primary payer categories: public insurance and OOP payments. Data were stratified by health condition, age group, sex, type of care, and income level. A combination of the National Health Insurance (NHI) dataset and the Korea Health Panel Survey (KHPS) was used to estimate total health expenditures, with multiple imputation methods applied to address data gaps. Findings: Healthcare expenditure in South Korea rose significantly from $45.6 billion in 2011 to $76.9 billion in 2020, placing an increasing economic burden on the system. Public health insurance spending grew at an annual rate of 5.1%, while OOP expenses rose by 5.0% for covered services and 6.7% for uncovered services. Despite a shift toward greater public funding-with public expenditure comprising 64.4% of total spending in 2020-OOP payments still accounted for 35.6%, remaining above the OECD average. Individuals aged 60 and above contributed to 51.3% of total expenditures. Gender disparities emerged, especially in high-cost areas like obstetrics and gynecology, where women incurred higher OOP costs. Additionally, uncovered services experienced significant spending growth across all income levels, with major cost contributors including musculoskeletal disorders, urinary tract disorders, and chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Interpretation: This study highlights the need for targeted healthcare policies in South Korea to address rising costs and persistent inequalities. High OOP expenses disproportionately impact vulnerable groups, especially women and the elderly, while uncovered medical costs are growing across income levels, straining households. Conditions like musculoskeletal disorders, hypertension, and diabetes, along with gender-specific costs such as obstetric care, emphasize access inequities. Uncovered OOP expenses are rising faster than covered services, particularly among older adults. Addressing these issues requires policies to ease financial burdens and ensure equitable healthcare access. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.