Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840251›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2025

From Farms to Labs: The New Trend of Sustainable Meat Alternatives.

Abdul Samad, So-Hee Kim, Chan-Jin Kim, Eun-Yeong Lee, Swati Kumari, Md Jakir Hossain, Amm Nurul Alam, Ayesha Muazzam, Young-Hwa Hwang, Seon-Tea Joo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdul SamadDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-3363
So-Hee KimDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3966-6160
Chan-Jin KimDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-6873
Eun-Yeong LeeDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-7349
Swati KumariDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3330-7821
Md Jakir HossainDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7663-9202
Amm Nurul AlamDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-3718
Ayesha MuazzamDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5155-6629
Young-Hwa HwangInstitute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-3535
Seon-Tea JooDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-2828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat analogs or meat alternatives mimic conventional meat by using non-meat ingredients. There are several reasons for the rising interest in meat alternatives, e.g., health-consciousness, environmental concerns, and the growing demand for sustainable diets. Factors like low-calorie foods, low-fat, efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and flexitarian lifestyles are also contributing to this change (conventional to meat analogs). Numerous meat substitutes are presently being launched in alternative meat markets. Plant-based meat, restructured meat, cultured meat, hybrid cultured meat, and insect protein-based meat are prevalent among meat alternatives. The scope of meat alternatives, including plant-based meat, cultured meat, restructured meat, and insect-based protein products, is expanding due to advances in food technology. Innovation in food technology plays a crucial role in sustainable food production. Still, there are some challenges to the market of meat alternatives, including consumer acceptance, the appearance of meat alternatives, and the cost of production. Innovative approaches, such as advanced technologies and awareness of meat alternatives to the meat consumer, are required to deal with these challenges. This review briefly examines the technological advances, regulatory requirements, pros and cons, and market trends of meat alternatives. The finding of this review highlights the importance of meat alternatives as a sustainable resource of food. Moreover, meat alternatives can fulfill the increasing demand for meat and also decrease the environmental impact. Additionally, this review also explores ways to improve the overall market scenario of meat alternatives.

Indexed as

cultured meatinsect protein-based meatmeat analogplant-based meat alternativesrestructured meat

Identifiers

PMID39840251
PMCPMC11743840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.