Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840401›Full record

ArticleACS food science & technology2025

Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat: A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment.

Derrick Risner, Patrick Negulescu, Yoonbin Kim, Cuong Nguyen, Justin B Siegel, Edward S Spang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS food science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Environmental Impacts of Cultivated (Lab-Based) Blue Foods.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Environmental Sustainability of Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Beyond Plants: The Ultra-Processing of Global Diets Is Harming the Health of People, Places, and Planet.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derrick RisnerDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-3091
Patrick NegulescuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Yoonbin KimDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-2560
Cuong NguyenDivision of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Holtville, California 92250, United States.
Justin B SiegelGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Edward S SpangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-078X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in animal cell-based meat (ACBM) as an environmentally conscious replacement for livestock production has been increasing; however, a life cycle assessment (LCA) for the existing production methods of ACBM has not been conducted. Currently, ACBM products are being produced at a small scale, but ACBM companies are intending to scale-up production. Updated findings from recent technoeconomic assessments (TEAs) of ACBM were utilized to perform an LCA of near-term ACBM production. A scenario analysis was conducted utilizing the metabolic requirements examined in the TEAs of ACBM, and a purification factor was utilized to account for growth medium component processing. The results indicate that the environmental impact of near-term ACBM production has the potential to be significantly higher than beef if a highly refined growth medium is utilized for ACBM production. This study highlights the need to develop a sustainable animal cell growth medium that is optimized for high-density animal cell proliferation for ACBM to generate positive economic and environmental benefits.

Identifiers

PMID39840401
PMCPMC11744764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.