Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841182›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025

Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with SERATEX

Reut Rotem, Yara Alkeesh, Ayala Hirsch, Inbar Ben-Shachar, Naama Marcus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reut RotemDepartment of Urogynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton Rd, Wilton, Cork, Ireland. reutah86@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-5911
Yara AlkeeshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Ayala HirschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-1851
Inbar Ben-ShacharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Naama MarcusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8320-285X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery has evolved toward minimally invasive techniques. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) is associated with reduced morbidity and lower mesh exposure risks. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of LSHP using the SERATEX

methodsA retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent LSHP with SERATEX

resultsTwenty-five women underwent LSHP with a mean age of 46 years. Most patients had isolated apical prolapse without other symptoms. Intraoperatively, 75% had concomitant cervical shortening, 10% had anterior colporrhaphy, and 30% had mid urethral sling, with a mean surgery duration of 112 min and no postoperative complications. Median follow-up was 66 months. Three patients (12%) experienced prolapse recurrence, mainly cystocele with two requiring reoperations. Four patients conceived and delivered post-procedure, all via cesarean section. At the long-term telephone interview, 76.2% were very happy with the surgery, 14.3% happy, and 9.5% unhappy.

conclusionsLSHP with the SERATEX

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical MeshAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic sacrohysteropexyPelvic organ prolapseSafetySERATEX® SlimSling® meshUterine preservation

Identifiers

PMID39841182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.