Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841856›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2025

Beyond

Marco G Casteleijn, Ulrike Abendroth, Anne Zemella, Ruben Walter, Rashmi Rashmi, Rainer Haag, Stefan Kubick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cell-free protein synthesis platforms for accelerating drug discovery.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco G CasteleijnVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Ulrike AbendrothVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Anne ZemellaFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology (IZI), Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses (IZI-BB), Am Mühlenberg, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-5423
Ruben WalterFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology (IZI), Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses (IZI-BB), Am Mühlenberg, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Rashmi RashmiFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Rainer HaagFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Stefan KubickFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-4117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout history, we have looked to nature to discover and copy pharmaceutical solutions to prevent and heal diseases. Due to the advances in metabolic engineering and the production of pharmaceutical proteins in different host cells, we have moved from mimicking nature to the delicate engineering of cells and proteins. We can now produce novel drug molecules, which are fusions of small chemical drugs and proteins. Currently we are at the brink of yet another step to venture beyond nature's border with the use of unnatural amino acids and manufacturing without the use of living cells using cell-free systems. In this review, we summarize the progress and limitations of the last decades in the development of pharmaceutical protein development, production in cells, and cell-free systems. We also discuss possible future directions of the field.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteinsAnimalsCell-Free SystemHumansMetabolic EngineeringPharmaceutical PreparationsAmino AcidsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39841856
PMCPMC11826901

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.