Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841949›Full record

GuidelineJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

Stéphanie Gaillard, Christina Lacchetti, Deborah K Armstrong, William A Cliby, Mitchell I Edelson, Agustin A Garcia, Rahel G Ghebre, Gregory M Gressel, Jamie L Lesnock, Larissa A Meyer and 7 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Effect of Cancer Antigen-125 Elimination Rate Constant K andSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stéphanie GaillardJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2174-3693
Christina LacchettiAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-713X
Deborah K ArmstrongJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-803X
William A ClibyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-7565-9884
Mitchell I EdelsonJefferson Health-Abington, Willow Grove, PA.
Agustin A GarciaLSU School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Rahel G GhebreUniversity of Minnesota Medical School & St Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-0888-5109
Gregory M GresselCorewell Health Cancer Center and Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-6729-4571
Jamie L LesnockUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Larissa A MeyerUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-7463
Kathleen N MooreUniversity of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-0718
Roisin E O'CearbhaillMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-4554
Alexander B OlawaiyeUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ritu SalaniUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-343X
Dee SparacioPatient Representative, Hightstown, NJ.
Willemien J van DrielNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-1994
William P TewMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-4470

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALAN KEITH MEEKER · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).

methodsA multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review.

resultsSixty-one studies form the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration-approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines.This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialChemotherapy, AdjuvantCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID39841949
PMCPMC11934100

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.