Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843210›Full record

ReviewGenome research2025

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cell-free-DNA-based diagnostics.

W H Adrian Tsui, Spencer C Ding, Peiyong Jiang, Y M Dennis Lo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W H Adrian TsuiCenter for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Spencer C DingCenter for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Peiyong JiangCenter for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4523-3476
Y M Dennis LoCenter for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China; loym@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of circulating fetal and tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) molecules in plasma has opened up tremendous opportunities in noninvasive diagnostics such as the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and cancers and in posttransplantation monitoring. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies makes it possible to scrutinize the characteristics of cfDNA molecules, opening up the fields of cfDNA genetics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, and fragmentomics, providing a plethora of biomarkers. Machine learning (ML) and/or artificial intelligence (AI) technologies that are known for their ability to integrate high-dimensional features have recently been applied to the field of liquid biopsy. In this review, we highlight various AI and ML approaches in cfDNA-based diagnostics. We first introduce the biology of cell-free DNA and basic concepts of ML and AI technologies. We then discuss selected examples of ML- or AI-based applications in noninvasive prenatal testing and cancer liquid biopsy. These applications include the deduction of fetal DNA fraction, plasma DNA tissue mapping, and cancer detection and localization. Finally, we offer perspectives on the future direction of using ML and AI technologies to leverage cfDNA fragmentation patterns in terms of methylomic and transcriptional investigations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCell-Free Nucleic AcidsMachine LearningFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID39843210
PMCPMC11789496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.