ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Distributed training of foundation models for ophthalmic diagnosis.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Federated Learning for Multi-Disease Ophthalmic Diagnostics Using OCT Angiography.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Federated learning for privacy-preserving ophthalmic artificial intelligence: clinical applications and translational challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Compact vision language models enable efficient and interpretable optical coherence tomography through layer-specific multimodal learning.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Distributed training of foundation models for ophthalmic diagnosis.Communications engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision impairment affects nearly 2.2 billion people globally, and nearly half of these cases could be prevented with early diagnosis and intervention-underscoring the urgent need for reliable and scalable detection methods for conditions like diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Here we propose a distributed deep learning framework that integrates self-supervised and domain-adaptive federated learning to enhance the detection of eye diseases from optical coherence tomography images. We employed a self-supervised, mask-based pre-training strategy to develop a robust foundation encoder. This encoder was trained on seven optical coherence tomography datasets, and we compared its performance under local, centralized, and federated learning settings. Our results show that self-supervised methods-both centralized and federated-improved the area under the curve by at least 10% compared to local models. Additionally, incorporating domain adaptation into the federated learning framework further boosted performance and generalization across different populations and imaging conditions. This approach supports collaborative model development without data sharing, providing a scalable, privacy-preserving solution for effective retinal disease screening and diagnosis in diverse clinical settings.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.