ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Death risk prediction model for patients with non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- The predictive value of serological markers for successful weaning and 30-day mortality in patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Glycemic Variability as a Predictor of Mortality in Sepsis Patients With Concurrent Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
- Predicting mortality in non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage with glucose and lipid data.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The incremental value of unstructured data via natural language processing in machine learning-based COVID-19 mortality prediction: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Nomogram based on pan-immune-inflammation value to predict short-term prognosis in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the risk of death from non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using a machine learning model.
methods1274 ICH patients who met the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed retrospectively in the MIMIC IV 3.0 database. Patients were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing datasets in a ratio of 6:2:2 based on the outcome distribution. Data from the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University were used as an external validation set. This study used LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression analysis to screen for features. We then employed XGBoost to construct a machine-learning model. The model's performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis, calibration curve analysis, clinical decision curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score. Conclusively, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to interpret the model's predictions.
resultsDeaths occurred in 572 out of the 1274 ICH cases included in the study, resulting in an incidence rate of 44.9%. The XGBoost model achieved a high AUC when predicting deaths in ICH patients (train: 0.814, 95%CI: 0.784 - 0.844; validation: 0.715, 95%CI: 0.653 - 0.777; test: 0.797, 95%CI: 0.743 - 0.851). The importance of SHAP variables in the model ranked from high to low was: 'GCS motor', 'Age', 'GCS eyes', 'Low density lipoprotein (LDL)', ' Albumin', ' Atrial fibrillation', and 'Gender'. The XGBoost model demonstrated good predictive performance in both the validation and external validation datasets.
conclusionsThe XGBoost machine learning model we built has demonstrated strong performance in predicting the risk of death from ICH. Furthermore, the SHAP provides the possibility of interpreting machine learning results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.