ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
High-dimensional multiple imputation for partially observed confounders including natural language processing-derived auxiliary covariates.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cautionary Note for Plasmode Simulation Studies in the Setting of Causal Inference.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing Treatment Effects in Observational Data With Missing Confounders: A Comparative Study of Practical Doubly-Robust and Traditional Missing Data Methods.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple imputation (MI) models can be improved with auxiliary covariates (ACs), but their performance in high-dimensional data remains unclear. We aimed to develop and compare high-dimensional MI (HDMI) methods using structured and natural language processing (NLP)-derived AC in studies with partially observed confounders. We conducted a plasmode simulation with acute kidney injury as outcome and simulated 100 cohorts with a null treatment effect, incorporating creatinine labs, atrial fibrillation (AFib), and other investigator-derived confounders in the outcome generation. Missingness was imposed on creatinine based on creatinine itself and AFib. Different HDMI candidate ACs were created using structured and NLP-derived features, and we mimicked scenarios where AFib was unobserved by omitting it from all analyses. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, we selected HDMI covariates for MI and propensity score models. The treatment effect was estimated after propensity score matching in MI datasets, and HDMI methods were compared to baseline imputation and complete case analysis. High-dimensional MI using claims data showed the lowest bias (0.072). Combining claims and sentence embeddings led to an improvement in the efficiency with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.173 and 94% coverage. Natural language processing-derived AC alone did not outperform baseline MI. High-dimensional MI approaches may decrease bias in studies where confounder missingness depends on unobserved factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.