ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025
[Simultaneous determination of 51 indazole-type synthetic cannabinoids in urine and blood by online solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-linear ion trap mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Determination of 65 synthetic cannabinoids in whole blood by QuEChERS-ultra performance liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evade legal controls, new psychoactive substances (NPS), which have been designed as substitutes for traditional and synthetic drugs, are gradually dominating the drug market. Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs), which account for the majority of NPS, are rapidly being derivatized; consequently, controlling increasing abuse by merely listing individual compounds is difficult. Therefore, China has included the entire SC category of SCs listed as legal controlled substances since July 1, 2021. However, new SCs obtained through structural modification are still appearing and pose significant analytical challenges for forensic laboratories. Therefore, an efficient, green, and automated detection method is urgently required to provide technical support for the accurate screening actual samples. Meanwhile, the number of indazole-type SCs has increased sharply since 2013, which is ascribable to their stronger psychoactive effects. Indeed, forensic laboratories mainly analyze this key SC subclass. Therefore, in this study, we developed a new method for analyzing 51 indazole-type SCs in human urine and blood, which involves online solid-phase extraction (online SPE) as the preprocessing technology, with analysis performed using liquid chromatography-linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Deproteinization was achieved by adding acetonitrile, with dilution performed using 10 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution (pH 4.8) containing 0.1% formic acid. Samples were then analyzed directly using acetonitrile-10 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) as the mobile phase. The mass-to-charge ratios of protonated molecular ions ([M+H]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.