SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024
The efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for psychological health and quality of life among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive behavioral therapy's impact on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Bayesian adaptive randomized trial of blended cognitive behavioral therapy for severe fatigue in stable diffuse glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Trial
- Managing psychological distress in women with breast cancer: A systematic review of intervention trends in the past decade.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- Article
- Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on cancer-related fatigue and psychological status in ovarian cancer patients: A meta-analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy versus standard information brochures in advanced cancer caregivers: randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically investigate the effect of Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) on depression, anxiety, fatigue and quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer (BC). Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. Ten databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, JBI Chinese Biomedical database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang, were searched from the start till August 2023. Published studies in English or Chinese were eligible for randomized and clinical controlled trials determining the efficacy of ICBT among BC survivors. The quality of the evidence was evaluated at the study level and the outcome level. Results: In total, 11 clinical trials on 1,307 patients with BC (ICBT: 671, control: 636) were systematically reviewed. We found that ICBT is effective in alleviating psychological distress in BC survivors, and the quality of all studies was moderate. The meta-analysis indicated that ICBT affected primary outcomes of anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.19, -0.24, Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that ICBT, as a type of psychosocial rehabilitation, can mitigate the incidence of depression, anxiety, and fatigue and improve the quality of life among patients with BC. Nevertheless, the effect is not distinct, and multi-centered randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts are warranted to verify the effectiveness of ICBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.