Trial reportFrontiers in public health2024
Development of a statewide network hub for screening, referral, and enrollment into food as medicine programs across Kentucky.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06033664 (Grocery Prescription Program for Medicaid Adults With Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Grocery Prescription Program for Medicaid Adults With Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a Community-Driven, Locally Sourced Medically Tailored Meal Model: A Pilot Linking Healthcare, Farmers, and Patients.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Feasibility study of a screening decision tool for allocating adults into food is medicine programs as an effective approach to target clinical and dietary outcomes among rural and urban adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Fresh funds for moms: feasibility of a 12-week online food as medicine grocery prescription program for women with food insecurity and gestational diabetes.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widespread recognition of food as medicine interventions' role in reducing food insecurity and improving health outcomes has recently emerged. Several states have released In Lieu of Services, state-approved alternative services that may be offered by managed care organizations in place of covered benefits, or 1,115 Medicaid waivers, which may allow for expanded nutrition services to reduce food insecurity and improve health outcomes. However, there are significant gaps in understanding how to create a statewide system for delivering "healthcare by food" interventions. The University of Kentucky Food as Health Alliance first piloted the development of a statewide hub facilitating referral to, enrollment in, and evaluation of food as medicine programs across two healthcare providers (one urban and one rural). We then used a quasi experimental study design to examine effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in a target population of Medicaid eligible individuals aged 18-64 with high blood pressure and/or type 2 diabetes in rural and urban areas. Participant allocation was based on geographic location for each program arm with no control group. This feasibility case study aims to: (1) outline the development of a referral system between healthcare and food as medicine providers; (2) describe gaps in referral and enrollment; (3) summarize lessons learned from a statewide network as a blueprint for other states; and (4) present clinical outcomes across three food as medicine programs. Ninety-two referrals were received from UK HealthCare with 21 enrolled in medically tailored meals and 28 enrolled in a grocery prescription (53% enrollment rate). Thirty-two referrals were received from Appalachian Regional Healthcare with 26 enrolled in meal kits (81% enrollment rate). On average, the reduction in systolic blood pressure was 9.67 mmHg among medically tailored meals participants and 6.89 mmHg among grocery prescription participants. Creating a statewide system to address food insecurity and clinical outcomes requires key support from a host of stakeholders. Policy steps moving forward need to consider funding and infrastructure for screening, referral, enrollment and engagement hubs for improved health outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06033664.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.