Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845718›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2025

Machine learning for refining interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging scans in the management of multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.

Adam C Szekely-Kohn, Marco Castellani, Daniel M Espino, Luca Baronti, Zubair Ahmed, William G K Manifold, Michael Douglas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Semi-Supervised Learning for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam C Szekely-KohnSchool of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1005-603X
Marco CastellaniSchool of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Daniel M EspinoSchool of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7608-5619
Luca BarontiSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2883-706X
Zubair AhmedUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
William G K ManifoldThe Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, UK.
Michael DouglasUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the brain and spinal cord with both inflammatory and neurodegenerative features. Although advances in imaging techniques, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have improved the process of diagnosis, its cause is unknown, a cure remains elusive and the evidence base to guide treatment is lacking. Computational techniques like machine learning (ML) have started to be used to understand MS. Published MS MRI-based computational studies can be divided into five categories: automated diagnosis; differentiation between lesion types and/or MS stages; differential diagnosis; monitoring and predicting disease progression; and synthetic MRI dataset generation. Collectively, these approaches show promise in assisting with MS diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity and prediction of future progression, all potentially contributing to disease management. Analysis quality using ML is highly dependent on the dataset size and variability used for training. Wider public access would mean larger datasets for experimentation, resulting in higher-quality analysis, permitting for more conclusive research. This narrative review provides an outline of the fundamentals of MS pathology and pathogenesis, diagnostic techniques and data types in computational analysis, as well as collating literature pertaining to the application of computational techniques to MRI towards developing a better understanding of MS.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputational methodsmachine learningmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)multiple sclerosis (MS)

Identifiers

PMID39845718
PMCPMC11750376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.