SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2024
The efficacy and safety of qiwei baizhu san in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, mostly resulting from impaired insulin production and diminished glucose metabolism regulation. Qiwei Baizhu San (QWBZS) is a classic formula used in traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of T2DM. A comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of QWBZS in the treatment of T2DM is essential. Methods: This study's protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024576129). As of August 2024, we searched eight databases to screen and include randomized controlled trials of QWBZS for T2DM. Heterogeneity sources were examined via subgroup analyses, the robustness of the results was determined by sensitivity analyses, publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test, evidence quality was appraised with GRADEpro, and possible mechanisms of QWBZS for T2DM were categorized and summarized. Results: This analysis encompassed 14 qualifying trials with a total of 1,169 subjects. The analytical results suggested that QWBZS, when combined with conventional treatment, was more effective than conventional treatment alone in improving FBG, 2hPG, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C. When QWBZS was used alone, it was more effective than conventional therapy in FBG, 2hPG, and HbA1c. And QWBZS could improve the overall effectiveness of clinical treatment in T2DM patients. The impact of QWBZS therapy alone on HOMA-IR and lipid metabolism remained unclear due to the limited number of trials included. Analysis of adverse events suggested that QWBZS was relatively safe. Conclusion: This study suggested that QWBZS, when combined with conventional treatment, was more effective in improving glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, and lipid metabolism compared to conventional treatment alone in individuals with T2DM. QWBZS alone also contributed to the regulation of blood glucose levels. Meanwhile, QWBZS could improve the overall effective rate of clinical treatment with a relatively high safety profile. Nevertheless, owing to the inferior quality and significant heterogeneity of the existing evidence, additional high-quality studies are requisite to furnish more dependable evidence for the future clinical application of QWBZS. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=576129, identifier [CRD42024576129].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.