Evidence mapPaperPMID 39845879Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Unraveling the dual threat: sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity in diabetes risk.

Hui Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hui ShiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the alterations in diabetes risk associated with sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity, as well as the demographic shifts within the diabetic population. Method: Utilizing pertinent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database spanning 2011 to 2018, the criteria for sarcopenia were established by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. These criteria were calculated using lean body mass data in conjunction with body mass index data. Physical activity levels were assessed using the PAQ questionnaire from the NHANES database. The presence of diabetes was determined through the DIQ questionnaire and the laboratory examination within the NHANES database. The analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Result: The prevalence of both sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity in the diabetic population was 188% greater than in the non-diabetic population. Sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity were positively correlated with an increased risk of diabetes onset, demonstrating a 1.45-fold heightened risk when both conditions were present (OR=2.45,95%CI,1.35-4.44,P<0.05). This combined effect was significantly greater than the risk associated with sarcopenia alone (OR=1.84,95%CI,1.09-3.11,P<0.05) or insufficient physical activity alone (OR=1.55,95%CI,1.11-2.15,P<0.05). Conclusion: A synergistic relationship exists between sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity, resulting in a markedly elevated risk of diabetes when both conditions are present concurrently. Therefore, comprehensive diabetes management strategies should prioritize populations exhibiting both sarcopenia and insufficient physical activity.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusExerciseSarcopeniaAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk FactorsdiabetesNHANESphysical activitypopulation structuresarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39845879
PMCPMC11750674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.