ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Sudoscan
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Treg cells in diabetes mellitus and association with traditional Chinese medicine: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Association between insulin resistance and sudomotor dysfunction in adults with type 1 diabetes.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine if the detection of DAN through Sudoscan Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 161 patients with T2DM who had undergone Sudoscan Results: Estimated cardiovascular risk according to the ESC 2023 without consideration of DAN was low for 91 (57%), moderate for 53 (33%), high for 11 (7%) and very high for 22 (3%) of patients. While inclusion of DAN resulted in low risk in 81 (51%), moderate in 46 (28%9, high in 9(5%) and very high risk for 25 ((16%), Conclusions: Sudoscan
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.