ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
An increase in flow-diverter oversizing values as an independent risk factor for developing more severe in-stent stenosis. A retrospective single-center study based on flow diversion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison Between Pipeline Embolization Device and Derivo Embolization Device for the Treatment of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: A Single-Center Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: "Stent-within-a-Stent" technique after telescopic flow diverter reconstruction for basilar artery aneurysm with proximal stenosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the past decade, flow diverters (FDs) have increasingly been used to treat cerebral aneurysms with unfavorable morphology in which other endovascular techniques fall short of being as effective. In-stent stenosis (ISS) is one of the most puzzling and frequent risks of flow diversion therapy observed on follow-ups. This complication, although mostly placid in its clinical course, can have dire consequences if patients become symptomatic. ISS is associated with many factors, none of which have been demonstrated to date to be solely responsible for the phenomenon. Methods: This study was aimed at evaluating ISS incidence in patients in our clinic who were treated with flow-diverters for aneurysms, located on the supraclinoid segments of the internal carotid artery between September 2022 and May 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted, which included 137 patients with a total of 142 aneurysms being treated. The main hypothesis was that oversizing of the implant might play a role in ISS development. The performed statistical analysis, aimed at finding a correlation between it and vessel lumen narrowing on the follow-ups. The effects of other known risk factors, such as sex, age, smoking, and hypertension, were also analyzed. Results: Stent oversizing with respect to the parent artery was positively correlated with subsequent ISS occurrence and severity. Older age was a protective factor against ISS. Patients who actively smoked had diminished risk of developing severe ISS. Discussion: Stent oversizing can lead to ISS development, which might be more pronounced with larger implant-to-vessel sizing discrepancies. To achieve optimal results, the choice of implant diameter should consider all segments of the vessel in which it will be implanted. In cases of severe symptomatic ISS, continuation of dual anti-platelet therapy is a reasonable and effective option to address this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.