ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Comparison of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation, matched sibling donor hematopoietic cell transplantation, and chemotherapy in patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming therapeutic challenges in acute myeloid leukemia: active targeting strategies by nano-drug delivery systems.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with improved survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring favorable-risk genetic features at initial diagnosis: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chemotherapy are considered potentially curative options for post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the comparative effectiveness of these approaches in favorable- and intermediate-risk AML remains unclear and requires further investigation. Methods: In this retrospective study, 111 patients diagnosed with de novo favorable- and intermediate-risk AML, categorized according to the ELN 2022 guidelines, were investigated to compare outcomes following autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT), matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT), and chemotherapy. Through propensity score matching for disease status before HSCT, 42 cases in first complete remission were selected for each of the auto-HSCT group and the MSD-HSCT group. Additionally, 27 cases in the chemotherapy group, excluding patients with early relapse or death, were included for comparison. Results: In the overall population, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 85.7%, 83.1%, and 70.4% (p = 0.043), while the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 78.6%, 83.2%, and 57.1% (p = 0.002) in the auto-HSCT, MSD-HSCT, and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Notably, both auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT demonstrated significantly improved DFS compared to chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk AML. Multivariate analysis further revealed that chemotherapy was significantly associated with inferior DFS compared to auto-HSCT (HR=2.82; 95% CI, 1.26-6.32, p=0.012), while DFS was similar between the MSD-HSCT and auto-HSCT groups (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.31-2.09, p=0.645). Discussion: The findings suggested the advantages of both MSD-HSCT and auto-HSCT over chemotherapy as post-remission therapy for AML patients with favorable and intermediate risk. Further research is needed to support these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.