Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845982›Full record

ArticleGenome integrity2024

Transforming Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Medical Imaging and Drug Response Prediction.

Karthik Prathaban, M Prakash Hande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome integrity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karthik PrathabanDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-540X
M Prakash HandeDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-6256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a broad range of enhancements in medicine. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have shown significant potential in improving diagnosis and treatment outcomes, from assisting clinicians in diagnosing medical images to ascertaining effective drugs for a specific disease. Despite the prospective benefits, adopting AI in clinical settings requires careful consideration, particularly concerning data generalisation and model explainability. This commentary aims to discuss two potential use cases for AI in the field of medicine and the overarching challenges involved in their implementation.

Indexed as

AI in biomedicineArtificial intelligencedrug responsemedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID39845982
PMCPMC11752870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.