Evidence mapPaperPMID 39847431Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Patient Experiences and Perspectives When MyChart is Introduced in a Large Community Hospital: Mixed Methods Study.

Shelley Vanderhout, Shipra Taneja, Kamini Kalia, Walter P Wodchis, Terence Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Collaboration Breakdowns Between Provider Teams and Patients in Post-Surgery Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shelley VanderhoutInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-2680
Shipra TanejaInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-8952
Kamini KaliaTrillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7891-510X
Walter P WodchisInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2494-7031
Terence TangInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-7298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals, or secure websites linked to electronic medical records, have emerged as tools to provide patients with timely access to their health information. To support the potential benefits of patient portals such as improved engagement in health care, it is essential to understand how patients and caregivers experience these portals.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore patient and caregiver experiences, facilitators, and barriers to accessing and using a patient portal called MyChart during the initial stages of its implementation.

methodsWe applied explanatory sequential mixed methods to conduct a web-based questionnaire and semistructured interviews with MyChart users and nonusers at a large community hospital in Ontario, Canada. Among users, we explored user satisfaction with MyChart, its impact on care, and areas for improvement. For nonusers, we explored barriers to MyChart access and willingness to use it in the future. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used for data analysis.

resultsA total of 5651 patients and caregivers completed the web-based questionnaire and 18 (12 users and 6 nonusers) participated in interviews. MyChart users primarily learned about the portal through email (n=1288, 39%), after-visit summaries (n=953, 29%), and hospital staff (n=408, 12%). Nonusers cited lack of awareness (n=1291, 59%) and registration difficulties (n=707, 32%) as some barriers to activation and adoption, but the majority would consider activating and using MyChart if they could learn more about it (n=1126, 54%). Users valued MyChart for preparing for health care encounters but expressed dissatisfaction with limited features and access to medical history and test results, whereas nonusers tended to be unsure about the benefits of using MyChart, especially if they were infrequent health care users.

conclusionsPatient portals offer benefits, but barriers to access and limited functionality can hinder widespread use. To enhance the adoption and potential benefits of patient portals, targeted outreach and comprehensive access to health information are essential to promote positive and seamlessly integrated health care experiences.

Indexed as

Hospitals, CommunityPatient PortalsPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOntarioSurveys and QuestionnairesCanadacaregiver experiencedescriptive statisticselectronic medical recordshealth informationimplementationlearning health systemsLHSmixed methodsmixed methods studypatient experiencespatient perspectivespatient portalthematic analysisuser satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39847431
PMCPMC11803326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.