Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Leslie Cuellar-ViteDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-1334
Elyse M DonaubauerDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-6916
Kristen L Weber-BonkDepartment of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-5800
Jessica R BobbittDepartment of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-6961-4970
Natasha N InglesDepartment of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7059-8955
Taylor L BrzozowskiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-2834
Fadi W Abdul-KarimAnatomic Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-6120
Christine N BoothAnatomic Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-7047-4031
Ruth A KeriDepartment of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-1640-3088
Funding
GRADUATE TRAINING IN CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM008056 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, JOHN ALAN, SNIDER, MARTIN D · 1985 to 2019
$7.1M
University of California and UT Southwestern D-PDTCU54CA283766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Luis Guillermo Carvajal Carmona · 2023 to 2026
$5.9M
RESEARCH ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA059366 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, MARK W. · 1993 to 2025
$5.5M
Medical Scientist Training Program at Case Western Reserve UniversityT32GM152319 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Broihier, Alex Yee-Chen Huang · 2024 to 2026
$5.1M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICST32GM008803 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MIEYAL, JOHN J, NIEMAN, MARVIN THOMAS · 2001 to 2023
$4.2M
Supplement - Discovering the role of YES1 in triple negative breast cancerR01CA257502 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KERI, RUTH A. · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Elucidating and Leveraging the mTOR Negative Feedback Pathway in Breast CancerR01CA213843 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KERI, RUTH A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Functional Genomics Training Program (FGTP)T32GM135081 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas Louis LaFramboise, Helen C Miranda · 2020 to 2026
$1.3M
Functional Proteomics by Reverse Phase Protein Array in CancerR50CA221675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LU, YILING · 2017 to 2021
$726k
Targeting NEK2 to potentiate standard of care therapies for breast cancerR21CA288795 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KERI, RUTH A. · 2024 to 2025
$414k
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3U54CA283766-02S2National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA257502National Cancer Institute (NCI) T32CA059366National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM008056National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM008803National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM135081NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213843NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257502NCI NIH HHS R21 CA288795NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221675NCI NIH HHS T32 CA059366NCI NIH HHS U54 CA283766NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008056NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008803NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135081NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152319
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
EGFR is a highly expressed driver of many cancers, yet the utility of EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) is limited to cancers that harbor sensitizing mutations in the EGFR gene because of dose-limiting toxicities. Rather than conventionally blocking the kinase activity of EGFR, we sought to reduce its transcription as an alternative approach to broaden the therapeutic window for EGFR inhibitors targeting wild-type (WT) or mutant EGFR. We found that YES1 is highly expressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and drives cell growth by elevating EGFR levels. Mechanistically, YES1 stimulates EGFR expression by signaling to JNK and stabilizing the AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun. This effect extends beyond TNBC as YES1 also sustains EGFR expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells, including those that harbor the EGFR gatekeeper mutation T790M. The novel ability of YES1 to regulate the expression of WT and mutant EGFR mRNA and protein provides a potential therapeutic opportunity of utilizing YES1 blockade to broadly increase the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors. Indeed, we observed synergy within in vitro and in vivo models of TNBC and non-small cell lung cancer, even in the absence of EGFR-activating mutations. Together, these data provide a rationale for blocking YES1 activity as an approach for improving the efficacy of EGFR-targeting drugs in cancers that have generally been refractory to such inhibitors. Implications: YES1 sustains EGFR expression, revealing a therapeutic vulnerability for increasing the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors by lowering the threshold for efficacy in tumors driven by the WT or mutant receptor.
Indexed as
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-yesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMutationXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-yesYES1 protein, human
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Exploiting YES1-Driven EGFR Expression Improves the Efficacy of EGFR Inhibitors. · full record | Socratic