Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39848949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Individual-specific strategies inform category learning.

Jared S Collina, Gozde Erdil, Mingyi Xia, Christopher F Angeloni, Katherine C Wood, Janaki Sheth, Konrad P Kording, Yale E Cohen, Maria N Geffen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jared S CollinaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gozde ErdilDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mingyi XiaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher F AngeloniDepartment of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Katherine C WoodSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Janaki ShethDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Konrad P KordingDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yale E Cohen *Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maria N Geffen *Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mgeffen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-2993

Funding

Circuit Mechanisms of Sound Processing and Detection in the Auditory PathwayR01DC014479 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2015 to 2024
$4.7M
Neuronal circuits supporting learning-driven changes in auditory perception.R01DC015527 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Maria Neimark Geffen · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Neuronal circuits for context-driven bias in auditory categorizationR01NS113241 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COHEN, YALE E, GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Cross-disciplinary training in computational approaches to the neuroscience of audition and communicationT32DC016903 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Vijay Balasubramanian, Yale E Cohen · 2018 to 2026
$1.4M
The function of cortical gain adaptation in detecting sounds in noise.F31DC016524 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ANGELONI, CHRISTOPHER F. · 2017 to 2019
$123k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC016524NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014479NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015527NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC016903NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113241U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R01NS113241U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) T32DC016903U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) R01DC014479U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) R01DC015527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorization is an essential task for sensory perception. Individuals learn category labels using a variety of strategies to ensure that sensory signals, such as sounds or images, can be assigned to proper categories. Categories are often learned on the basis of extreme examples, and the boundary between categories can differ among individuals. The trajectories for learning also differ among individuals, as different individuals rely on different strategies, such as repeating or alternating choices. However, little is understood about the relationship between individual learning trajectories and learned categorization. To study this relationship, we trained mice to categorize auditory stimuli into two categories using a two-alternative forced choice task. Because the mice took several weeks to learn the task, we were able to quantify the time course of individual strategies and how they relate to how mice categorize stimuli around the categorization boundary. Different mice exhibited different trajectories while learning the task. Mice displayed preferences for a specific category, manifested by a choice bias in their responses, but this bias drifted with learning. We found that this drift in choice bias correlated with variability in the category boundary for sounds with ambiguous category membership. Next, we asked how stimulus-independent, individual-specific strategies informed learning. We found that the tendency to repeat choices, which is a form of perseveration, contributed to long-term learning. These results indicate that long-term trends in individual strategies during category learning affect learned category boundaries.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionLearningAcoustic StimulationAnimalsChoice BehaviorMaleMice

Identifiers

PMID39848949
PMCPMC11758382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.