Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849486›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Satisfied with the worst health outcomes or unsatisfied with the best: explaining the divergence between good patient-reported outcomes and low satisfaction and vice versa among knee arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study.

Lukas Schöner, Viktoria Steinbeck, Reinhard Busse, Carlos J Marques

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating Patient Satisfaction Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty Done at Our Hospital's Joint Replacement Registry, Egypt.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas Schöner *Department of Health Care Management, School of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, (Secretariat H80) Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany. Lukas.schoener@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-2145
Viktoria Steinbeck *Department of Health Care Management, School of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, (Secretariat H80) Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2950-9057
Reinhard BusseDepartment of Health Care Management, School of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, (Secretariat H80) Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4961-9130
Carlos J MarquesDepartment of Performance, Neuroscience, Therapy, and Health, Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-6382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis but some patients exhibit a discrepancy between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient satisfaction (PS). This study aims to identify predictors for patients reporting unfavorable PROs but high PS and vice versa. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study categorized patients from nine German hospitals into four groups based on (i) whether they achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in knee functionality, measured with a joint-specific PRO from admission to 12-month post-surgery; and (ii) whether they were satisfied at 12 months post-surgery. The groups were (A) Satisfied Achievers (satisfied, MCID reached), (B) Dissatisfied Achievers (not satisfied, MCID reached), (C) Satisfied Non-Achievers (satisfied, MCID not reached) and (D) Dissatisfied Non-Achievers (not satisfied, MCID not reached). Exploratory analyses were performed to understand differences between the four groups using chi-squared tests and ANOVA. Multinomial logistic regression models were conducted to identify predictors for the allocation of patients in groups.

resultsA total of 1546 knee arthroplasty patients with a mean age of 65.9 years, 54.1% female, were included. 1146 (74.1%) patients were Satisfied Achievers, 131 (8.5%) were Dissatisfied Achievers, 141 (9.1%) were Satisfied Non-Achievers, and 128 (8.3%) Dissatisfied Non-Achievers. The results showed that higher improvements in health-related quality of life, pain and fatigue symptoms significantly decreased the likelihood of being a Dissatisfied Achiever and a Satisfied Non-Achiever. Comorbidities of blood circulation, chronic back pain or diabetes increased the likelihood of being a Dissatisfied Achiever, while depression decreased the likelihood of being a Satisfied Non-Achiever.

conclusionAddressing individual health concerns, e.g. through expectation management, and assessing alternative treatment options might improve satisfaction in line with functional improvements. A closer evaluation at which physical impairment level surgery is beneficial could help to improve the care of Satisfied Non-Achievers.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeExpectation managementKnee arthroplastyPatient-reported outcomePatient satisfactionQuality measurementValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39849486
PMCPMC11755965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.