Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849536›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2025

Relationship between enriched environment and neurodegeneration: a review from mechanism to therapy.

Yuan-Qiao Xu, Yanjiao Chen, Jia-Xin Xing, Jun Yao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan-Qiao Xu *School of Forensic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Yanjiao Chen *Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Xin XingSchool of Forensic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China. jxxing@cmu.edu.cn.
Jun YaoSchool of Forensic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China. yaojun198717@163.com.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province 2023JH2/101600008Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province 2023-MS-182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enriched environment (EE), as a non-pharmacological intervention, has garnered considerable attention for its potential to ameliorate neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). This review delineated the impact of EE on the biological functions associated with NDs, emphasizing its role in enhancing neural plasticity, reducing inflammation, and bolstering cognitive performance. We discussed the molecular underpinnings of the effects of EE, including modulation of key signaling pathways such as extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), and AMPK/SIRT1, which were implicated in neuroprotection and synaptic plasticity. Additionally, we scrutinized the influence of EE on epigenetic modifications and autophagy, processes pivotal to ND pathogenesis. Animal models, encompassing both rodents and larger animals, offer insights into the disease-modifying effects of EE, underscoring its potential as a complementary approach to pharmacological interventions. In summary, EE emerges as a promising strategy to augment cognitive function and decelerate the progression of NDs.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsAutophagyDisease Models, AnimalEnvironmentEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeuronal PlasticitySignal TransductionAnti-inflammatoryCognitive functionEnriched environmentNeurodegenerationNeuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID39849536
PMCPMC11761206

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.