Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849669›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2025

Machine Learning-driven Identification of the Honeymoon Phase in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes and Optimizing Insulin Management

Satheeskumar R

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Satheeskumar RNarasaraopeta Engineering College, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Andhra Pradesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0002-4642-7339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The honeymoon phase in type 1 diabetes (T1D) represents a temporary improvement in glycemic control but may complicate insulin management. The aim was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-driven method for accurately detecting this phase to optimize insulin therapy and prevent adverse outcomes. Methods: Data from pediatric T1D patients aged 6-17 years, including continuous glucose monitoring data, glucose management indicator (GMI) reports, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, and patient medical history, were used to train ML models including long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, transformer models, random forest, and gradient boosting machines (GBMs). These were designed to analyze glucose trends and identify the honeymoon phase in T1D patients. Results: The transformer model achieved the highest accuracy at 91%, followed by GBMs at 89%, LSTM at 88%, and random forest at 87%. Key features, such as glucose variability, insulin adjustments, GMI values, and HbA1c levels were critical to model performance. Accurate identification of the honeymoon phase enabled optimized insulin adjustments, enhancing glucose control and reducing hypoglycemia risk. Conclusion: The ML-driven approach provides a robust method for detecting the honeymoon phase in T1D patients, demonstrating potential for improved personalized insulin management. The findings suggest significant benefits in patient outcomes, with future research focused on further validation and clinical integration.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Glycemic ControlHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMachine LearningAdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinHoneymoon phaseinsulin managementmachine learningtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39849669
PMCPMC12372630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.