ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Current status of nanofat in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Outcomes of Patients With Hyperuricemia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Observational
- Comparative outcome analyses of stromal vascular fractionWorld journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder requiring innovative treatment approaches.
aimTo evaluate the use of nanofat, a specialized form of adipose tissue-derived cells, in the treatment of OA, by examining its efficacy, safety profile, mechanisms of action, comparative effectiveness, and long-term outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive review of preclinical studies, clinical trials, and
resultsClinical studies consistently reported the efficacy of nanofat in providing pain relief and functional improvement in patients with OA. Local adverse events were limited to the injection site, such as localized pain and inflammation, and resolved within a few days to weeks. Systemic adverse events were rare, and no significant long-term complications were observed. Mechanistically, nanofat was found to enhance chondrocyte proliferation, reduce inflammation, and promote angiogenesis, thereby contributing to its therapeutic effects.
conclusionNanofat therapy holds promise as a therapeutic option for managing OA, providing pain relief, functional improvement, and potential tissue regeneration. The safety profile of nanofat treatment appears favorable, but long-term data are still limited. Standardized protocols, larger randomized controlled trials, longer follow-up periods, and cost-effectiveness evaluations are warranted to establish optimal protocols, comparative effectiveness, and long-term outcomes. Despite current limitations, nanofat therapy demonstrates translational potential and should be considered in clinical practice for OA treatment, with careful patient selection and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.