ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Integrative proteomic analysis reveals the potential diagnostic marker and drug target for the Type-2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The escalating prevalence of Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poses a significant global health challenge. Utilizing integrative proteomic analysis, this study aimed to identify a panel of potential protein markers for T2DM, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and paving the way for personalized treatment strategies. Methods: Proteome profiles from two independent cohorts were integrated: cohort 1 composed of 10 T2DM patients and 10 healthy controls (HC), and cohort 2 comprising 87 T2DM patients and 60 healthy controls. Differential expression analysis, functional enrichment analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and classification error matrix analysis were employed. Results: Comparative proteomic analysis identified the differential expressed proteins (DEPs) and changes in biological pathways associated with T2DM. Further combined analysis refined a group of protein panel (including CA1, S100A6, and DDT), which were significantly increased in T2DM in both two cohorts. ROC analysis revealed the area under curve (AUC) values of 0.94 for CA1, 0.87 for S100A6, and 0.97 for DDT; the combined model achieved an AUC reaching 1. Classification error matrix analysis demonstrated the combined model could reach an accuracy of 1 and 0.875 in the 60% training set and 40% testing set. Conclusions: This study incorporates different cohorts of T2DM, and refines the potential markers for T2DM with high accuracy, offering more reliable markers for clinical translation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-025-01562-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.