ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring RNA-Seq Data Analysis Through Visualization Techniques and Tools: A Systematic Review of Opportunities and Limitations for Clinical Applications.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of Bulk and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analyses in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic Analysis of High-Intensity Interval Training in High-Fat-Diet-Induced Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats' Brains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Beyond the Exome: The Role of Noncoding and Regulatory Variants in Monogenic Diseases.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics in metastatic breast cancer: mapping tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Unraveling atherosclerosis through single-cell RNA sequencing: insights into cellular heterogeneity and disease mechanisms.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a prominent resource for transcriptomic analysis due to its ability to measure gene expression in a highly sensitive and accurate manner. With the increasing availability of RNA-seq data analysis from clinical studies and patient samples, the development of effective visualization tools for RNA-seq analysis has become increasingly important to help clinicians and biomedical researchers better understand the complex patterns of gene expression associated with health and disease. This review aims to outline the current state-of-the-art data visualization techniques and tools commonly used to frame clinical inferences from RNA-seq data and point out their benefits, applications, and limitations. A systematic review of English articles using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases was performed. Search terms included "RNA-seq", "visualization", "plots", and "clinical". Only full-text studies reported between 2017 and 2024 were included for analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, a total of 126 studies were identified, of which 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found that 18% of studies have visualization techniques and tools for circular RNA-seq data, 56% for single-cell RNA-seq data, 23% for bulk RNA-seq data, and 3% for long non-coding RNA-seq data. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the common visualization tools and their potential applications, which is a useful resource for researchers and clinicians interested in using RNA-seq data for various clinical purposes (e.g., diagnosis or prognosis).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.