ReviewCells2025
Osteopontin as a Biomarker for Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum osteopontin is associated with coronary plaque vulnerability and short-term cardiovascular events: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Osteopontin: Its Properties, Recent Studies, and Potential Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Identification of Novel Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Cannabigerol in the Kidney Tissue of Rats Subjected to a High-Fat High-Sucrose Diet.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteopontin (OPN) is a sialylated phosphoprotein highly expressed in atherosclerosis and upregulated in settings of both acute and chronic inflammation. It is hypothesised that plasma levels of OPN may correlate with the presence of coronary artery disease, "CAD". This offers potential as a point-of-care testing biomarker for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and prognosis. This review evaluates the current literature on the association between plasma OPN levels and coronary artery disease and what is currently known to support its potential as a biomarker for future practice. Electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were undertaken from inception until July 2024. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were observational, with gross heterogeneity in methods used to analyse the association of plasma OPN with clinical characteristics. They included case series, case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort study designs. OPN has been linked to higher cardiovascular risk and unfavourable cardiovascular outcomes. However, the evidence regarding the direct assessment of CAD severity using tools like the SYNTAX or TIMI scores, which focus on anatomical complexity and risk factors, is less definitive. This suggests that OPN may be a more precise reflection of the inflammatory processes and atherosclerotic activity contributing to unfavourable outcomes rather than a direct indicator of the anatomical severity of CAD itself. Consequently, OPN is increasingly perceived as a marker of a poor prognosis rather than a tool for assessing the severity of coronary artery lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.