Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851792›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2024

Guidelines for the Management of Complications of Diabetes in Saudi Arabia Using Delphi Technique for Consensus Among National Experts.

Raed Aldahash, Mohammed A Batais, Ashraf El-Metwally, Saja Alhosan, Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammed Almutairi, Abdulghani Alsaeed, Mohammed Alsofiani, Mohammed AlMehthel, Mohammed Aldubayee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raed AldahashDepartment of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A BataisDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf El-MetwallyKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Saja AlhosanSaudi National Diabetes Center, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh 13315, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlharbiDeputyship for Therapeutic Services, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 12613, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-6643-8032
Mohammed AlmutairiInternal Medicine Department, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulghani AlsaeedPrince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlsofianiEndocrinology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlMehthelObesity, Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4031-881X
Mohammed AldubayeeKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1215-1573
Khaled AldossariDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Sulieman AlshehriSaudi National Diabetes Center, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh 13315, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Saudi Arabia has one of the leading cases of diabetes globally, with approximately 27.8% of adults suffering from the disease. Given the negative consequences of diabetes mellitus (DM), it is critical to develop guidelines for its management. (2) Methods: After a thorough review of the literature around diabetes management, a diverse panel of 14 clinical experts was identified to participate in the Delphi process. The Delphi process included three rounds to ensure all available evidence was accounted for. (3) Results: The Delphi method concluded with a total of 37 guidelines reviewed and approved by the panelists, followed by verification from a third party in Saudi Arabia. The Delphi and external evaluation confirmed that authentic, relevant, and applicable evidence for diabetes management in Saudi Arabia was accounted for. The process concluded with a list of 37 statements about the management of acute and chronic complications of diabetes in Saudi Arabia. (4) Conclusions: The preparation of contextual evidence for the management of diabetes in Saudi Arabia will be instrumental in addressing the burden of disease in the region. The guidelines offer useful insights into diabetes care, especially by prioritizing early detection and proactive management of complications. They highlight the importance of lifestyle changes and medical therapy. However, due to the ever-changing nature of diabetes, the document must be monitored and updated on a regular basis to ensure its continued relevance and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Delphi techniquediabetesdiabetes complicationsdiabetes managementdiabetes screeningguidelines

Identifiers

PMID39851792
PMCPMC11763823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.