Evidence mapPaperPMID 39851975Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Current Status of Bioprinting Using Polymer Hydrogels for the Production of Vascular Grafts.

Jana Matějková, Denisa Kaňoková, Roman Matějka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jana MatějkováDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 27201 Kladno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9763-6405
Denisa KaňokováDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 27201 Kladno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0006-2035-2064
Roman MatějkaDepartment of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 27201 Kladno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9596-3069

Funding

Czech Technical University in Prague SGS22/201/OHK4/3T/17Ministry of Health NW24J-02-00061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death and serious illness in Europe and worldwide. Conventional treatment-replacing the damaged blood vessel with an autologous graft-is not always affordable for the patient, so alternative approaches are being sought. One such approach is patient-specific tissue bioprinting, which allows for precise distribution of cells, material, and biochemical signals. With further developmental support, a functional replacement tissue or vessel can be created. This review provides an overview of the current state of bioprinting for vascular graft manufacturing and summarizes the hydrogels used as bioinks, the material of carriers, and the current methods of fabrication used, especially for vessels smaller than 6 mm, which are the most challenging for cardiovascular replacements. The fabrication methods are divided into several sections-self-supporting grafts based on simple 3D bioprinting and bioprinting of bioinks on scaffolds made of decellularized or nanofibrous material.

Indexed as

bioinksbioprintingdecellularized scaffoldelectrospun scaffoldsextrusion bioprintinginkjet bioprintingtissue-engineered vascular graftsvascular grafts

Identifiers

PMID39851975
PMCPMC11765431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.