ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Intraoperative Monitoring of Sensory Evoked Potentials in Neurosurgery: A Personalized Approach.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for motor function preservation during AVMs resection: Indication or redundancy? Beyond the doctrine of "all-or-nothing".Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Effect of intravenous infusion of remimazolam versus propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring stability and postoperative neurological function in patients undergoing spinal surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory evoked potentials (EPs), namely, somatosensory, visual, and brainstem acoustic EPs, are used in neurosurgery to monitor the corresponding functions with the aim of preventing iatrogenic neurological complications. Functional deficiency usually precedes structural defect, being initially reversible, and prompt alarms may help surgeons achieve this aim. However, sensory EP registration requires presenting multiple stimuli and averaging of responses, which significantly lengthen this procedure. As delays can make intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) ineffective, it is important to reduce EP recording time. The possibility of speeding up EP recording relies on differences between IONM and outpatient clinical neurophysiology (CN). Namely, in IONM, the patient is her/his own control, and the neurophysiologist is less constrained by norms and standards than in outpatient CN. Therefore, neurophysiologists can perform a personalized selection of optimal locations of recording electrodes, frequency filter passbands, and stimulation rates. Varying some or all of these parameters, it is often possible to significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for EPs and accelerate EP recording by up to several times. The aim of this paper is to review how this personalized approach is or may be applied during IONM for recording sensory EPs of each of the abovementioned modalities. Also, the problems hindering the implementation and dissemination of this approach and options for overcoming them are discussed here, as well as possible future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.