ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a patient with dextrocardia and prior secundum atrial septal defect repair: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation in the management of atrial fibrillation: A narrative review.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Review
- Pulsed field ablation using a large-tip focal contact force-sensing catheter with 3-dimensional mapping integration: 12-Month outcomes from the OMNY-AF pilot phase.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using a Focal, Contact-Force Sensing Catheter: A Single-Center Case Series and Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electric Devices: Vigilance Is Warranted.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Review
- Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical applications and research advances.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a catheter-based procedure that utilizes short high voltage and short-duration electrical field pulses to induce tissue injury. The last decade has yielded significant scientific progress and quickened interest in PFA as an energy modality leading to the emergence of the clinical use of PFA technologies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. It is generally agreed that more research is needed to improve our biophysical understanding of PFA for clinical cardiac applications as well as its potential as a potential alternative energy source to thermal ablation modalities for the treatment of other arrhythmias. In this review, we discuss the available preclinical and clinical evidence for PFA for atrial fibrillation, developments for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation, and future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.