Article in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Shicheng HanLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.
Lin HanLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.
Fangying YuanLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.
Wenzhi LiuLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Technology, College of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Xiaofeng JinLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.
Yanchun SunLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products (Harbin), Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Harbin 150070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-4915
Funding
Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund，HRFRI HSY202304MChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project 2023T160720, 2020M681124National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD2400405, 2023YFD2400400Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province for Distinguished Young Scholars JQ2023C007Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China LBH-Z20099Sub project of National Agricultural Biological Breeding Major Project 2023ZD04065
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Exploring Disparities in Gill Physiological Responses to NaHCO · full record | Socratic