ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Characterizing the underlying microangiopathy of deep cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Management of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile cerebral amyloid angiopathy is likely responsible for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring in superficial (grey matter, vermis) cerebellar locations, it is unclear whether hypertensive arteriopathy (HA), the other major cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), is associated with cerebellar ICH (cICH) in deep (white matter, deep nuclei, cerebellar peduncle) regions. We tested the hypothesis that HA-associated neuroimaging markers are significantly associated with deep cICH compared to superficial cICH. PATIENTS AND
methodsBrain MRI scans from consecutive non-traumatic cICH patients admitted to a referral center were analyzed for cSVD markers. Clinical risk factors, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, a marker of hypertensive end-organ damage), and neuroimaging markers were compared between patients with deep and superficial cICH in univariate and multivariable models.
resultsHypertension and LVH were more common among 83 (64%) patients with deep cICH compared to 46 (36%) with superficial cICH. HA-related markers such as peri-basal ganglia white matter hyperintensity pattern, deep lacunes, severe basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces, and deep cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) were more common among those with deep vs. superficial cICH. Strictly lobar CMBs were less common among patients with deep cICH, whereas mixed-location CMBs were more common. After multivariable adjustment, LVH (aOR 4.06, 95% CI [1.22-13.50], p = 0.02), deep lacunes (aOR 6.02, 95% CI [1.46-24.89], p = 0.01), and strictly lobar CMBs (aOR 0.09, 95% CI [0.02-0.45], p < 0.01) remained significantly associated with deep cICH. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionBecause HA-associated markers are significantly associated with deep cICH, it is likely HA is the dominant underlying microangiopathy of this ICH subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.