Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Nebulization of 2% lidocaine has no detectable impact on the healthy equine respiratory microbiota.

Lauren Holley, Hannah N Creasey, Daniela Bedenice, Sarah Reed, Debora Regina Romualdo da Silva, Victoria Trautwein, Melissa Mazan, Giovanni Widmer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren HolleyCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Clinical Sciences, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.
Hannah N CreaseyCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.
Daniela BedeniceCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Clinical Sciences, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-8306
Sarah ReedUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Animal Science, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Debora Regina Romualdo da SilvaCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-6861
Victoria TrautweinCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Clinical Sciences, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.
Melissa MazanCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Clinical Sciences, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.
Giovanni WidmerCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, North Grafton, MA, United States of America.

Funding

Micro-engineered capsules for spatial sampling of microbiome in vivoR21AI144521 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI SONKUSALE, SAMEER R, WIDMER, GIOVANNI · 2020 to 2021
$592k
Ingestible Pill for spatially targeted sampling of gut microbiomeR21DK132314 · NIDDK · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI SONKUSALE, SAMEER R · 2022 to 2023
$440k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI144521NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK132314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucocorticosteroids remain the most common pharmaceutical approach for the treatment of equine asthma but can be associated with significant side effects, including respiratory microbiome alterations. The goal of the study was to assess the impact of 2% lidocaine nebulization, a projected alternative treatment of equine asthma, on the healthy equine respiratory microbiota. A prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded, 2-way crossover study was performed, to assess the effect of 1 mg/kg 2% lidocaine (7 treatments over 4 days) on the equine respiratory microbiota compared to control horses (saline and no treatment). Clinical assessments and respiratory samples, including nasal wash, endoscopic tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, were obtained at each sample collection timepoint. The profile of the respiratory bacterial microbiota was evaluated using 16S amplicon sequencing, and clinical data compared using related samples analyses, based on data normality. The treatment did not affect the clinical data or alter the tracheal and nasal microbiota in healthy horses. However, time explained 12.6% of microbiota variation among samples. A significant difference in bacterial composition was observed between nasal and tracheal samples, showing the greatest relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, respectively. Bacterial DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid did not amplify with generic primers targeting the V4 variable region of the prokaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, despite attempting multiple DNA extraction methods and PCR protocols, and after excluding PCR inhibition. This observation indicates that bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of healthy horses has a low bacterial load.

Indexed as

LidocaineMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCross-Over StudiesHorsesNebulizers and VaporizersProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16STracheaLidocaineRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39854381
PMCPMC11759996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.