ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2025
Impact of a personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering approach on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suppression of Early TNF-Alpha Increase by a Single Evolocumab Dose in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational, Multicenter study on long-term Effectiveness and tolerability of aliROcumab (OMERO): an Italian real-life experience.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Upfront Combination or Stepwise Escalation: Personalising LDL-C Reduction in Clinical Practice.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- VESALIUS keeps revolutionizing medicine: the case of evolocumab in primary prevention.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of gut microbiota translocation after acute myocardial infarction and its impact on prognosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Combined discriminative value of SII and sdLDL-C for 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with unstable angina pectoris.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- The CARDIOLIPID Plan: A Cardiovascular Risk-centred Implementation Framework for the Diagnosis and Management of Dyslipidaemia: Experts' Proposal.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Summary of the best evidence for non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Chinese expert consensus on the choice of initial cholesterol-lowering strategy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsConsidering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND
resultsWe retrospectively analysed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N = 198, January-June 2019), when the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N = 180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N = 122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared to the other periods, in Period C, there was a higher use of potent statins, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, and of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor inhibitors at discharge. This translated into higher achievement of the LDL-C goal (83% vs. 55% in Period A and 43% in Period B; P < 0.001) and reduced incidence of MACE (3% vs. 12% and 11%; P = 0.026). MACE rates were lowest in patients with early and sustained LDL-C <55 mg/dL and in those achieving both LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction.
conclusionThe systematic introduction of a personalized, SES strategy for LLT in patients with acute MI led to greater achievement of LDL-C goal and lower risk of MACE at 1 year vs. the stepwise approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.